# Typst vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typst | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 56 869 ✓ | 13 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 ✓ | +51 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Wallabag, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typst-vs-wallabag