# TypeType vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TypeType | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 53 765 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +370 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typetype-vs-windowsindocker