TypeTypevswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TypeType | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 7 205 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +242 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
wger is growing faster right now (+242 stars in 30 days).
TypeType details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep TypeType, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with