# TypeType vs Unison

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TypeType | Unison |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 5 560 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +66 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | OCaml |

## Which one should you pick?

Unison scores 65/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.

If you want the quickest setup, Unison is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)
- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typetype-vs-unison