TypeTypevsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TypeType | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 5 560 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Unison scores 65/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.
If you want the quickest setup, Unison is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
TypeType details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep TypeType, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with