TypesensevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typesense | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 27 063 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +470 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
Typesense details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Typesense, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with