# Typesense vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typesense | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 27 063 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +470 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Typesense scores 79/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typesense-vs-wyoming-piper