Typesensevswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typesense | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 27 062 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +476 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+476 stars in 30 days).
Typesense details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep Typesense, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with