# Typesense vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typesense | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 27 063 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +470 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Typesense scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typesense-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api