# Typecho vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typecho | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Blogging | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 12 456 | 53 743 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +348 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | ci · 17 Jul 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+348 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typecho-vs-windowsindocker