# Typecho vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typecho | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Blogging | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 12 456 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | ci · 17 Jul 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Typecho scores 66/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typecho-vs-windows-arm