# Typecho vs Wagtail

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typecho | Wagtail |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Blogging | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 455 | 20 594 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +89 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | ci · 17 Jul 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Wagtail scores 79/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.

Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Wagtail needs more configuration.

Wagtail is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)
- [Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-wagtail)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typecho-vs-wagtail