# Typebot vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typebot | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Chatbot | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 585 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +224 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.

If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Typebot is growing faster right now (+224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typebot-vs-windows-arm