# Twenty vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Twenty | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 21 in CRM | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 60 006 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 618 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 618 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/twenty-vs-windows-arm