# turbocloud-agent vs zane-ops

> Two self-hosted [Heroku alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/heroku), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | turbocloud-agent | zane-ops |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 35/100 | 52/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #7 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 21 | 1 388 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.15.1 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

zane-ops scores 52/100 against 35/100 for turbocloud-agent, so it is the safer default.

zane-ops ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for turbocloud-agent.

zane-ops is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [turbocloud-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent.md)
- [zane-ops](https://selfhost.directory/project/zane-ops) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zane-ops.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/turbocloud-agent-vs-zane-ops