turbocloud-agentvszane-ops
Two self-hosted Heroku alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| turbocloud-agent | zane-ops | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 35/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #7 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 21 | 1 388 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.15.1 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
zane-ops scores 52/100 against 35/100 for turbocloud-agent, so it is the safer default.
zane-ops ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for turbocloud-agent.
zane-ops is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
turbocloud-agent details →zane-ops details → All Heroku alternatives →