# tunesynctool vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tunesynctool | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 6 522 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +110 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

tunesynctool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tunesynctool-vs-zabbix