# tunesynctool vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tunesynctool | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tunesynctool-vs-workout-cool