# Tube Archivist vs Yopass

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 ✓ | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 16.0.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 66/100 for Yopass, so it is the safer default.

Yopass ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Yopass is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Yopass](https://selfhost.directory/project/yopass) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yopass.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-yopass