Tube ArchivistvsYopass
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Yopass | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 3 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 16.0.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 66/100 for Yopass, so it is the safer default.
Yopass ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Yopass is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist details →Yopass details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Yopass, compare it with