Tube ArchivistvsWren AI OSS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Wren AI OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 18 000 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +255 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 56 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | wren-v0.17.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wren AI OSS scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Wren AI OSS ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Wren AI OSS is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Wren AI OSS is growing faster right now (+255 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Wren AI OSS details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Wren AI OSS, compare it with