# Tube Archivist vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-wps-office