# Tube Archivist vs WindsurfAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | WindsurfAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 30/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #121 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 ✓ | 3 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.141.592657 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | — |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 30/100 for WindsurfAPI, so it is the safer default.

WindsurfAPI ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [WindsurfAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/windsurfapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windsurfapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-windsurfapi