# Tube Archivist vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 53 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +323 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+323 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-windowsindocker