# Tube Archivist vs windmill

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 18 315 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +286 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 164 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.853.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

windmill scores 77/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

windmill ships more often: 164 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, windmill is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

windmill is growing faster right now (+286 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [windmill](https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-windmill