# Tube Archivist vs wger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | wger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 ✓ | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +240 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

wger scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.

If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

wger is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [wger](https://selfhost.directory/project/wger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-wger