# Tube Archivist vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 ✓ | 8 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-warpgate