Tube ArchivistvsWagtail
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Wagtail | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 20 594 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wagtail scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Wagtail is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist details →Wagtail details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Wagtail, compare it with