# Tube Archivist vs Vigil365

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Vigil365 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-vigil365