# Tube Archivist vs Vaultwarden

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Vaultwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 89/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 28 in Password Managers |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 69 894 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +1 774 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.37.4 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Vaultwarden scores 89/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Vaultwarden ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Vaultwarden is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Vaultwarden is growing faster right now (+1 774 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Vaultwarden](https://selfhost.directory/project/vaultwarden) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vaultwarden.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-vaultwarden