Tube ArchivistvsVaultwarden
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Vaultwarden | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 28 in Password Managers |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 69 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +1 756 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 1.37.4 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Vaultwarden scores 89/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Vaultwarden ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Vaultwarden is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Vaultwarden is growing faster right now (+1 756 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Vaultwarden details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Vaultwarden, compare it with