# Tube Archivist vs Vane

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Vane |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 37 835 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +928 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vane scores 81/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Vane.

If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Vane is growing faster right now (+928 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Vane](https://selfhost.directory/project/vane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vane.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-vane