Tube ArchivistvsUnregistry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Unregistry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 4 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.4.3 · 12 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Unregistry, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Unregistry.
If you want the quickest setup, Unregistry is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Unregistry details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Unregistry, compare it with