Tube ArchivistvsUniFi Docker Container
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | UniFi Docker Container | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 10.6.106 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 53/100 for UniFi Docker Container, so it is the safer default.
UniFi Docker Container ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, UniFi Docker Container is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →UniFi Docker Container details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep UniFi Docker Container, compare it with