Tube ArchivistvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with