# Tube Archivist vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.0.0a0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 65/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-umap