# Tube Archivist vs Ultimate Certificate Manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Ultimate Certificate Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 ✓ | 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.246 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 50/100 for Ultimate Certificate Manager, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Ultimate Certificate Manager.

If you want the quickest setup, Ultimate Certificate Manager is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Ultimate Certificate Manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/ultimate-ca-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ultimate-ca-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-ultimate-ca-manager