# Tube Archivist vs TwitchDropsMiner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | TwitchDropsMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 ✓ | 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 51/100 for TwitchDropsMiner, so it is the safer default.

TwitchDropsMiner ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, TwitchDropsMiner is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [TwitchDropsMiner](https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-twitchdropsminer