# Tube Archivist vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tube Archivist | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 60 037 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +2 579 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 579 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tube-archivist-vs-twenty