# trusted-cgi vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trusted-cgi | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 249 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trusted-cgi-vs-uptime-kuma