# trip2g vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trip2g | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 2 925 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +123 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trip2g-vs-zot-registry