# trip2g vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trip2g | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trip2g-vs-windows-arm