# trip2g vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trip2g | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 17 189 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

Upptime is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trip2g-vs-upptime