# Trinity vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Trinity | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #60 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 713 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.

Trinity is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Trinity](https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trinity-vs-windows-arm