# trigger vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trigger | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 648 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +249 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

trigger is growing faster right now (+249 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trigger-vs-wraft