# trigger vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trigger | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 16 644 | 89 717 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +2 428 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trigger-vs-world-monitor