# trigger vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trigger | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 16 645 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

trigger is growing faster right now (+258 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trigger-vs-urbit