# trigger vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | trigger | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 16 650 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +251 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

trigger is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trigger-vs-tunesynctool