# Trenova vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Trenova | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 314 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.

## Details

- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/trenova-vs-windows-arm