# transfer.sh vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transfer.sh | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 905 ✓ | 6 518 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +107 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transfersh-vs-zabbix